WebJun 22, 2013 · To summarize quickly, I think Scala is more approachable but less “pure” than F#. Scala seems to have a diverse set of influences whereas F# tries to stick … http://timkellogg.me/blog/2013/06/22/comparing-scala-to-fsharp

Scala vs. F#: Comparing Functional Programming Features

WebMay 19, 2010 · F# will infer that x is an integer because I add 1 to it, and so x will be treated as an integer (Int) type. Here is the same example in Scala: def increment(x:Int) = x + 1 def handler( f:Int => Int) = f(2) println( handler( increment )) F# vs. Scala: Lazy Evaluation. … Web1. The nice thing about F# is that due to its mixed paradigm it provides a better starting point for the OO programmer. He can gradually come up to speed with functional thinking and still fall back on using familiar OO libraries as he would have in C#. Haskell forces the whole functional enchilada on you all at once. easy cool whip frosting

Haskell vs. F# vs. Scala - Heriot-Watt University

WebAnd lastly, the F# and Scala communities are less like two rival groups of barbarians storming the same castle than they are like one group of barbarians temporarily divided … http://duoduokou.com/scala/39776112445122848108.html WebJan 30, 2012 · Fold takes an explicit initial value for the accumulator while reduce uses the first element of the input list as the initial accumulator value. This means the accumulator and therefore result type must match the list element type, whereas they can differ in fold as the accumulator is provided separately. easy curves baseball